Book Review: Stardust

“A philosopher once asked, "Are we human because we gaze at the stars, or do we gaze at them because we are human?  Pointless, really..."Do the stars gaze back?" Now that's a question.” 

 

Less than a week before my ASCP exam.  Fourth night of my seven on.  Bring it on!  That's my life right now.  But I still found the time to do a little reading.  I actually study better when I don't study non-stop.  And that's actually true of the majority of the world, no matter how much we try to fight it.




You know those people who say that the book is always better than the movie?  Well, they're usually right.  But sometimes, you can't make generalizations like that.  This is one of those examples.  The movie was phenomenal.   It was fun, clever and tender.  It was thoroughly enjoyable.  The book was usually so, but the ending was awful.  There's all of this build and potential.  And then, all of the sudden...it ends.

Stardust is about Tristran Thorn (they changed it to Tristan in the movie for ease of pronunciation), who lives in the English country-town of Wall.  There, in a desperate attempt to win over Victoria Forester, he tells her he will do anything if she will give his heart's desire.  As his promises get more and more outlandish, he tells her he will fetch that star that they just saw fall.  She, assuming it will never happen, and that he would never actually try, says that if he fetches her that star, she will give him his heart's desire.  He takes her seriously.  However, after crossing the wall into the land of Faerie, he learns that there, stars are not hunks of rocks, but ladies, this one being one named Yvaine.  And he's not the only one that wants that star.

One thing that I really, really enjoyed about this book is that it's traditional in style.  There is a big push in modern literature to be edgy, and different, and for prose to be inventive.  There's nothing inherently wrong with that, but sometimes it's good to remember that we perhaps tell stories in the classic "There once was a boy named..." format because we like it.  Neil Gaiman has said that he consciously wrote in the English pre-Tolkien fantasy style.

It was fun and imaginative, and I liked it.

The downside was the end.  The villains didn't seem to get their come-uppance at all, the romance seemed to go from "I hate you" to "I love you" without much motivation (or rather the motivation was in the "several weeks passed" phase that got hopped over), and the end seemed to be, "Then they were deadbeats for awhile, before settling down and living happily ever after."  It just seemed anti-climactic to me.

However, it was enjoyable and a good read.  But the movie was actually better.  3 stars to Stardust.

Comments

Amy R said…
I do enjoy that movie. After your review, however, I don't know if I'll ever put the time into the reading book.
March 23, 2014 at 12:19 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Over-analyzing Disney Movies: The Little Mermaid--Why Eric is White.

Image
I have recently noticed a trend of just purely over-analyzing Disney movies.  In this category, I also include the fascination with photoshopping Disney characters to swap genders, races, or eras, as well as making princesses have "realistic" body shapes (which is something I could write a whole other post about, and it wouldn't be pretty.  Spoiler alert:  I find it to be one of the most unempowering trends of recent years).  However, I sometimes wonder at how much people are reading into Disney movies.  Today, I'm going to over-analyze their over-analysis. I recently read that the fact that Eric is a white prince is a representation of how we white-wash racial expectations for our children.  I'm not even sure what that sentence means.  It seems to have a lot of buzz words.  But I'm going to show you today, using evidence from the film, why Prince Eric is, in fact, the correct color. (I will, however, say that Eric is the only Disney prince who legitimatel
Read more

Derevaun Seraun! Derevaun Seraun!

James Joyce is my kind of guy. He made puzzles that I like to think are just for me. He was a great lover of languages, and he is sometimes called the father of a literary technique called polyglotism. This is when you insert other languages in there. Just 'cuz. So, in James Joyce's wonderful story, "Eveline" there is a phrase that nobody knows what it is. Even to this day. "Derevaun Seraun! Derevaun Seraun!" Many people believe it to be corrupted Irish Gaelic. Needing a break from homework, I have approached this by taking the words and then transliterating them into Irish Gaelic, trying to create Irish Gaelic that would be spoken by someone of this status in this time in Ireland. Nationalist, but not educated enough to actually understand all the ins and outs of the language. I came up with two possible phrases that I find very probable. And I'm not pretending to solve the mystery. If Joyce experts over the years have not discovered the mean
Read more

What does it mean to be a Russell?

Image
As many know, most European families (not all, but most) have a coat of arms, a crest, a motto, all that good stuff. So, I decided to look a bit into what being a Russell means. And maybe I'll do the same for Hatches, because I am a Hatch too. The last name Russell is Scottish and means "Red-headed" and derives from the Norman name of Roussel. The Russells are a well-respected Highland Scot clan, complete with Scottish crest and tartan: The motto on the crest "virtus sine macula" means "Virtue without blemish." As Scotland incorporated more and more into England, the Russells became nobility in that world as well, and were thus presented with a coat of arms: And yes, the motto written on that one is "che sara sara." You've got to admit, that's pretty gosh-darn cool. It really does mean "Whatever will be, will be." And in honor of that:
Read more